Discussion about CGTrader Essentials Program

Discussion started by yellowapricotblossom

Hello everyone,

I would like to ask about the CGTrader Essentials subscription program.

My account is currently participating in CGTrader Essentials, where eligible models are included in the subscription library and revenue is shared based on total downloads from the monthly pool.

For designers who have experience with this program:

* Do you think CGTrader Essentials is beneficial?
* Does it increase your overall income or mainly generate very small earnings per download?
* Have you seen more downloads or sales after joining the program?
* Would you recommend staying in the program or opting out?

I would really appreciate hearing your experience and honest opinions.

Thank you.

Answers

Posted 2 months ago
10

It's a familiar path: almost all photo stocks now sell by subscription to somehow maintain competition. As a result, works are sold for 1 cent. Fortunately, there are still some 3D stocks that value the work of their creators. I'm stopping uploading my models and canceling my subscription program.

cgsoul2 wrote
cgsoul2
I absolutely agree! Subscriptions are a failing strategy for professionals. Selling a Mercedes for the price of a Fiat. We've seen this before, and more than once; you don't have to look far for examples. But it's very easy to discourage professionals from working under such a scheme.
Posted 2 months ago
9

I have canceled the subscription and do not plan to upload to the platform anymore. Both the reduction of the royalty percentage and the introduction of the subscription indicate that the platform is no longer relevant.

I have been working with stock platforms for 15 years, and I have seen this model many times. It usually happens when a marketplace is losing to competitors and is simply trying to stay afloat somehow. In general, everything is clear, there are no questions — it’s just time to move on.

Posted 3 months ago
8

This subscription system will result in contributors earning very small amounts per download of their models (often less than $0.50).
In my opinion, this is a poor decision for artists and a beneficial one mainly for the marketplace itself, which will profit far more than the creators.

I sincerely doubt that this model can have a positive impact on contributor income. Personally, at this stage, I am opting out of the subscription. I value my work, invest a lot of time and effort into it, and I do not want my models to be distributed almost for free.

I also struggle to understand who this system is supposed to benefit from the creator’s perspective. There are many other ways to stimulate sales and attract attention, such as regular promotions and sales, which we have already seen recently and which, in my view, are a much better solution.

The fact that a model costs less than $10 does not mean it is low quality. There are many artists on this platform who choose fair and accessible pricing, and their models are still high-quality and professionally made.

mak21 wrote
mak21
The platform will certainly make the most money, artists can try and then evaluate... everyone is the architect of their own destiny, there are those who sell models for a few dollars and those who sell them for hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Posted 3 months ago
6

I think it’s still quite new so I’m not sure if anyone has real experience with it yet, the main issue for me is that you have to opt in with all your models and you can’t just choose specific ones,

Personally I’ve decided to opt out, I’m not comfortable with some of my models or collections being sold for very low prices in exchange for volume, especially without knowing how it will work out, if there were an option to select which models to include I’d be more open to testing it and seeing how it performs

mak21 wrote
mak21
At this time it seems to me that models above $9.99 are not included in the program... at least I did a test and for now it seems to work with that price threshold.. so if you increase the price of some models they should be excluded... Check the list of eligible models for verification
Ocstard wrote
Ocstard
Yes that's possible, maybe I will test this thank you !
Posted 2 months ago
5

Personally, I do not intend to leave and will continue uploading my models, as I really like CGTrader. However, the latest updates are disappointing, and the subscription model feels like a final blow. I am not going to enable it and I urge everyone to do the same. I call on CGTrader to cancel this move; after all, you exist, you earn, and you have become one of the best 3D marketplaces thanks to us, the artists. I believe our contribution to this business must be respected and valued. I am certain that many other ways can be found to stimulate sales.

cgsoul2 wrote
cgsoul2
I'm completely with you, and you're right! CGTrader is treading a very fragile path to professional trust. I like CGTrader too, but this unhealthy reliance on a subscription model is starting to scare me. I've personally gone down this path on other platforms, where a similar model completely killed any desire to publish my own content, thereby killing my earnings. So, I hope CGTrader's management is aware of what's being discussed on the forums. Look at the banner on the start page—it makes you question how they treat authors...
Posted 6 days ago
4

They have finally published the earnings. While my sales took a 200$ hit last month, the earnings from subscriptions were 1$. Obviously this is crazy so I'm opting out.

Posted 2 months ago
3

An excellent solution to stimulate sales would be not to introduce any subscriptions to devalue the work of artists, but to remove all AI content so that the buyer can normally search for the right content on the site without wasting time flipping through pages with low-quality AI content, which many buyers ignore.

Normal site content, filling with high-quality content would definitely stimulate sales, there is no need to spend a lot of money on storing garbage AI content that does not sell, but only clogs the search and pushes users away from the site.

It would also be appropriate to introduce moderation for the uploaded content. Some artists slightly change the color of the model and sell it as a separate model, thereby clogging up the search, this is inadequate in my opinion, let them provide all the colors within the same product, or make significant differences.

I'm not going to leave the site either, but I'm boycotting subscription, I won't participate in it for anything, and if you force me, I'll have to leave the site or raise prices above the subscription threshold.

mak21 wrote
mak21
There is no need to delete the AI, there is already the filter option "Exclude AI generated content" as the search option "Subscription" has already appeared, everyone can filter what they want... I don't think subscription or AI will increase sales volume for artists... that said, they are tools and as such I will try them. If I don't like them, I'll abandon them. As for AI, I like how it's evolving, but that doesn't mean I'll sell its content for pennies because there's proof and proof and research into lighting and other things. If the customer likes it, they can consider it... if they don't, never mind... I still have expensive traditional models that won't fit into the AI ​​or Subscription discussion.... Probably when I've exhausted my curiosity about AI I'll continue to make traditional models but as always I'll sell them at not very cheap prices... if I spend time I don't give it away... best regards.
Posted about 1 month ago
2

I remember not choosing this Subscription feature, so why was it activated again?

For more than 12 days now, I haven’t sold a single 3D model.

haridon wrote
haridon
0 sales this month
Posted 2 months ago
2

Hi.
They've removed this link now. Buttons are being added and removed without any explanation. Does anyone know what's going on?

mdmominulisl789 wrote
mdmominulisl789
Yes. I know. But the subscription option is available now at the discount place. Only on and off.
mak21 wrote
mak21
Eligible Models disappeared... but on April 14th returned...
Posted 2 months ago
2

How desperate one needs to be to start giving away your models for cents? Subscription is essentially the same what 3dsky has been doing for years - fixed price for everything no matter how complex model is, except that they're asking $7 for a model and cgtrader is selling them for 40 cents. Feel the difference?
My sales completely stopped here, i guess that's how cgtrader is trying to force everyone to subscription - you will not sell here anything, unless you'll agree to sell everything for peanuts. Screw them, i rather pull my models out of here, or set them for free. One has to have some dignity and draw a red line - i will never join subscription program. It's crazy to see how some here are thinking that they will be able to earn anything from that.

mdmominulisl789 wrote
mdmominulisl789
You are right.
Posted 3 months ago
2

Why are such big changes being made without notice?

160 of my models have been added to the subscription. Which models are being added to the subscription? What are the terms and conditions?

1-Is this new system active now?
2-Can models currently be purchased as subscriptions?
3-Where can we see the purchases?

mak21 wrote
mak21
https://www.cgtrader.com/profile/subscription
hdpoly wrote
hdpoly
Thank you for your answer. Can models currently be purchased as subscriptions? Also, the earning tab is not clickable.
Posted 10 days ago
2

Mine earning tab is also greyed out. I keep asking them via support when will this be not greyed out. It’s been a month now in the subscription program and nothing yet while my sales have taken a big hit. If cg trader are already making money of us why not show the $ fugues. Feels like theft at the movement. Any more of this and I’m opting out.

Posted 27 days ago
1

Everyone can't access the "downloads" section? I haven't been able to access it for a month now. This subscription looks like some kind of scam.

Posted about 2 months ago
1

We took a step back and rethought our whole pipeline around the recent changes. Our product is megascans, so the goal was simple: maximize output with minimal manual work.

First decision — we completely dropped the subscription model. It just doesn’t fit how we operate.

Then I built a Blender addon that automates almost everything:

* generates previews from all angles
* creates clean LODs down to LOD6 without texture loss
* handles export (formats, mesh, etc.)

One click, ~7.5 minutes — and the asset is fully prepared.

On top of that, I made an AI assistant. It reads the addon’s log file, extracts all relevant data, and generates title, description, and keywords. You just type one word (e.g. “banana”), and it does the rest. At that point, it’s just copy-paste into the platform.

So total upload time per asset (including previews + metadata) is about 8 minutes, almost fully automated.

For PBR textures, we use a separate tool: you input the color map, and it generates the rest. That takes ~2 minutes.

The scan creation itself is also largely automated. With our current setup (even on older hardware), we get about 1 finished megascan per ~40 minutes of compute time, with minimal human involvement. Roughly speaking: ~1 scan per hour, passively.

Based on this, we decided to segment our content by value:

* simple, easily obtainable assets (rocks, walls, stumps, etc.) → mass-upload to this platform
* rare or high-value assets (antiques, unique props, etc.) → distributed to other marketplaces

So instead of treating everything equally, we now split assets into “buckets” depending on their value and rarity. This approach makes the whole system much more efficient and scalable.

Posted about 2 months ago
1

In my opinion, it really depends on the nature of your portfolio. If you create high-end, complex models, you'll likely find that the revenue share is way below their actual value. It feels like the platform is shifting towards a 'quantity over quality' model. While you might see a spike in download numbers, the earnings per download are usually discouraging compared to a single direct sale. Many of us worry it might devalue our work in the long run.

Posted about 2 months ago
1

Hello, anyone get any revenue from subscriptions this month? or it's not working yet?

mdmominulisl789 wrote
mdmominulisl789
You?
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Still not working. More than 2 months. When it will be launched? Maybe in september? I would expect that some CGT admin could say more. Because we know practically nothing.
Posted 15 days ago
1

Hi everyone,

I'm seeing a value of $9.56 in subscription earnings. Is anyone else experiencing subscription earnings?
I currently have 160 selected models for the subscription. The earnings are much less than I expected.
We've been waiting for 3 months. This amount is really low. There's no detailed information yet. How many downloads were made, what happened – it's unclear.
This is the most undesirable situation for designers. I don't accept this. It needs to be clearly stated which files were downloaded.

zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
My earnings tab is still greyed out and so unfortunately I cannot reach it. Yes transparency would be desperately needed. I do not understand why it lasts so very long time to make earnings tab visinle for everybody. And I fully agree that number of downloads is a must for us.
Posted 3 months ago
1

So far it looks good with parameters - inluded only cheap models and subscription plan enables to download 25 models per month.
Question is whether already some customers buyed the subscription. It looks like CGT is not propagating it so much - I would expect some emails etc.

mak21 wrote
mak21
Obviously I don't expect expensive models included in this subscription, it wouldn't make sense given the policy is low prices.
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Yes I also don't expect. As I have written it is good as it is. ))) BTW I tried to click on the subscription button and there is an error page. So it looks like it is still not functional.
Posted 3 months ago
1

hdpoly
I can't tell you if they can already be purchased, I think the earnings card will be active when we start selling something.

Posted 2 months ago
1

They forcibly added a lot of my models to the subscription and there were models more expensive than $ 10. Before that, I refused to participate in the subscription when I was asked to choose models for the subscription, and now they have forcibly sent them there. I don't agree to sell my models for cents, I value my work and I won't give it away for free.

You can disable this in the settings, but you will lose sales on large purchases and corporate transactions, and I didn't have them anyway.

Saturn-3D-Models wrote
Saturn-3D-Models
All of my models were added to Subscription. Even though the higher tier were priced at 15 dollars. I had to raise them to 18 dollars each before they were not included, perhaps because CGT was having another 50 percent off sale? My higher price models took weeks to perfect and create, optimized PBR textures and several file formats. Some of the model sold for 99 dollars and I sold many before 2015. Now an updated version might make me 20 cents in the subscription model. It wasn’t really about the money, but so much for incentive to continue…
Posted 2 days ago
1

They have enabled the subscription model on my products again without permission! I've already turned it off twice and I don't want to participate in this!!! In May, someone managed to download my models practically for free!!! Although I didn't allow it! This is madness on the part of CG Trader!

Posted 2 months ago
0

The problem with AI content is that far from all authors label it as AI.
Many people claim how super experienced and creative they are as artists, and then publish dozens or even hundreds of these insanely crooked AI models. They deliberately make low-quality renders so the distortions in the mesh and textures aren’t visible.

Respect to those who do label their work as AI — that’s honest. Even though I don’t understand it: AI is not creativity and not art. It’s an empty, soulless thing that may look impressive, but there’s nothing behind it.

mak21 wrote
mak21
Not labeling work as AI is stupid because more experienced clients recognize it... of course, if you flood the site with elements that can't be filtered, it's detrimental to those who work without using it. As for the rest, an endless debate could be opened... modeling is certainly much more satisfying than having an AI do the work... but there are things like fictional characters where I think she's very creative, and that's what interests me as a result. best regards.
Posted 2 months ago
0

I had tried the subscription option and some eligible models were no longer visible on my page but only in the subscription program, I deactivated the subscription option and all the models were visible again on my page.. I prefer control all my models... so I won't leave them in the subscription.. best regards..

mak21 wrote
mak21
They support informed me that the problem was in the cache and they fixed it... now even with the active subscription the models do not disappear.
Posted 3 months ago
0

What about buyers? How can you join the program and how can you see which models are opted-in ?

yellowapricotblossom wrote
yellowapricotblossom
...
hdpoly wrote
hdpoly
Click on the profile picture, and click subscription
Posted 3 months ago
-1

Has anyone tried it?

mak21 wrote
mak21
if the customer pays 9.99 a month for 25 models, that means the value for a single model is about $0.39, to which a percentage will be applied for the site that sells them and one for the author... perhaps $0.20 per model for the author? I think that in general the earnings will be those... I don't see large sales volumes for us, assuming my calculations are correct. It means that to earn $20 they have to download 100 of my 3D models... if they don't download them, obviously you don't earn anything. I understand that's how it works. If I'm wrong, correct me. Thanks.
Posted 3 months ago
-10

I would like thanks cgtrader team for bringing subscribers share system. I work on other platform on subscription share. It is beneficial for both buyer and seller and bring stable monthly earning.

amvnproduction wrote
amvnproduction
You are wrong. I've been working with stock agencies for over 10 years, and this is the path to devaluing all labor. All stock agencies that have switched to this model pay cents to their authors.

Your answer

In order to post an answer, you need to sign in.

Chat