CGTrader Considers 3D Model Rating

Discussion started by StudioVertex

CGTrader asks its customers (and therefore our buyers) via a questionnaire whether a quality rating for each model on the platform could influence their purchasing decision.

Each buyer is already free to rate the models they purchase, which seems logical.
But here, it seems that CGtrader is rating the models. Quality criteria are subjective and depend on the intended use, so I don't know if this is a good idea. It all depends on what is taken into account in the rating.

Personally, a non-PBR model isn't a lower-quality model than another. It's only if its topology is clean and suitable for the intended use. It's only if its UVs are correct, whether or not there are overlaps. I've seen fully triangulated models (like scans). Are they lower-quality? The names of objects and textures should be in lowercase, uppercase, with or without spaces, etc. The most important thing is that they be clearly labeled and allow for easy identification.

I think the idea is bad, and what matters most is the quality of the model description and the presentation images. This should ensure that the future customer clearly knows what they're buying. This is probably where improvements can be made.

And you, what do you think?

Answers

Posted about 20 hours ago
0

I agree with your point of view, this is CGTraders way of trying to mimic Stemcell, and its poorly done, inaccurate and is not updated when the model is resubmitted. Its a way of trying to standardize things, which is a good thing when it works - even if the artists dont agree with some of those things since consistency is always better for the buyer.

Personally most of the things I make are PBR because why not, it was a standard set back in 2017 and is quite easy to do and transfer models between different 3D software which gives you a wider audience, each to their own however. If you only sell prints for example these ratings are not in your favor and can potentially give you worse ratings even though they might be of high quality.

Posted about 19 hours ago
0

I fully agree that non-PBR model desn't have to be of lower quality automatically.
For example in my case my best-sellers are not textured (not UV mapped) vehicles models whereas most of my PBR models are not selling. Because my strategy is focusing on filling gaps in markets, high-quality topology and technical accurancy and clean design (if it is conceptual not branded model).
So yes every customer is different and there are many customers demandeing high-quality and unique models and they do not need PBR (they eventually will texture the model themselves).

Posted about 19 hours ago
0

And the same is on the main competitor site. Even I have 80+ certified StemCell models which are placed on high-position in search result, still my bestsellers are not certified, not textured and not UV mapped vehicles models. In other words if some model is not demanded by customers any certification or whatever official proof or quality will not do demanded model from undemanded model. By the way the same is valid for paid promotions of models. )))

3DCargo wrote
3DCargo
You realise to sell stemcell you are exclusive to TS. So selling here is breaking your contract...
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Where you were last 12 months? StemCell v2 is very long time for all artists. BTW if you look at my account on the other market you will see that I am not exclusive. Of course I am accepting all rules so I am not uploading the converted formats here (which is of course forbidden).
3DCargo wrote
3DCargo
You should read the contract, you cant sell anywhere, period. You didnt mention that you quit stemcell so I was just informing you in case you were not aware. Not having a dig at you mate.
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
There was maybe millions of posts on the forum in autumn 2024 where exclusive artists were complaining that this feature will be opened for all artists. And how could I quit StemCell? What a non-sense. I am not exclusive artist minimally 5 years. )))
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Ask other site forum if you do not know that StemCell is open for all artists.
3DCargo wrote
3DCargo
Ah yes I think you are right, I must be thinking of Checkmate.
Posted about 19 hours ago
-1

Of course that I am right. It was CheckMate.

3DCargo wrote
3DCargo
No need to be rude/emotional about it, we are here to help each other.
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Ok, sorry. All right. ))
3DCargo wrote
3DCargo
No problems :)
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Ok, sometimes I really must take some things less seriously. Looking forward for other discussions. )))
Posted about 17 hours ago
0

Staying united is our best strategy in the face of adversity.On this, they ask the buyers for their opinion but not the sellers.It is imposed on them.In view of the recent increase in royalties on the CGTrader side, it would be fairer if the sellers' opinions were also taken into account.

3DCargo wrote
3DCargo
Feels a bit like talking to the wall at this point. CGT rarely engage/reply with sellers on the forum, they cut our commission, as of this month they now can sell our products in bulk, they dont fix bugs that have lasted years, things tend to break often on the website... I think our opinion is about as important as a dead fly on this platform.
Posted about 16 hours ago
0

I agree. We have made certain arrangements.My post aims to provide information on a possible rating from CGtrader which in my opinion will harm sales as usual.

Your answer

In order to post an answer, you need to sign in.

Chat