While I fully agree with the OP on this, I think the issue here is the same as Artstation's "AI Gate" a couple of years ago:
Describing the water you are drowning in, doesn't save you, no matter how great you are at describing it.
The corporate speak we get from CGT is no different that that of any other corporation that has forgotten their reason-for-being and who made the company grow in the first place. Look at Adobe, Apple, most of the gaming industry etc etc etc.
The world is infatuated with AI right now, and trying to stop that trend is remarkably similar to when the internet became a thing, or when artists transitioned from analog tools to computers: A lot of yelling and screaming - and much of it rightfully so - but ultimately, it's like standing in front of a freight train waving your arms and telling it that it should stop in the name of fairness: It's a waste of time.
PS: I´m old enough to have experienced both transitions as a professional, and my best advice is: do NOT waste your time railing against AI. Find a way around it or with it.
Had this been ONLY about the CGT payout model, I would applaud this and even be optimistic about the prospect of CGT listening and rolling back this change.
However, just like the OP stated, this is CGT trying to secure their future (at least short term) by scaling up their AI product and “restructuring” their original/legacy business to make that transition as painless for them as possible. Not for artists, for them.
Being shocked that corporations prioritise their own interests over those of their contributors is honestly naive.
I´m not saying it’s right or fair; it isn’t - but every single business is trying to balance making money and squeezing partners/clients too much. Some are just better at creating win-win situations or have a more “humanistic” approach than others. CGT doesn’t seem to fall into this category.
I’ve been a relatively frequent 3d client for the past 5-6 years (appr. 100 projects and 1,000+ models on CGT), and my interest in models and projects have gone down significantly for the simple reason that the projects I do require less of both.
I personally don´t know if my clients want or use more AI-generated content/artwork, but I think the overall perception of art or artwork as something valuable has decreased dramatically because of AI-generated content flooding every SM platform.
Or perhaps my own work simply doesn’t seem valuable enough compared to much cheaper AI work.
Either way, it’s an absolute waste of time to be angry at or frustrated with AI.
It’s here to stay, and while it certainly will find a more “natural” place in the creative pipeline than it has now, it probably will take some time before it does.
In the meantime, there is only ONE way forward, and that is to
A) find another line of work.
B) figure out how to use AI in your work in a smart and profitable way.
C) keep doing conventional 3d models but in a way that truly stands out.
D) go bankrupt.
If CGT F’s you over, find another platform and move on.
Start building more and better dialogues with clients UNRELATED to 3d platforms (FYI the 3d artists that I are most top-of-mind for me are those on Patreon or Gumroad who have mailing lists).
Team up, build new coalitions, heck - start your OWN platform if the others suck.
And most importantly: Please stop wasting your precious creative energy on things you can’t change - including CGT´s policies.