M-Jet 60 - 3D Printable Jet Drive for Electric Surfboards

M-Jet 60 - 3D Printable Jet Drive for Electric Surfboards 3D print model

Description

Join the official M-Jet facebook group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/623045356071128

Propulsion system for DIY electric surfboards.

Basic PDF manual: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WgkuZUZwO3yLBlEEI8PD1eNt4OGTMnqZ/view?usp=sharing

Includes part list, print settings and basic assembly and installation guide.

You get 8 STL files for 8 parts of the jet drive, designed to be FDM 3D printed on any conventional 3D printer. You also get a STEP file of the whole pump, ready to be edited to your needs. You can 3D print it, assemble it with the help of a basic manual. Use two pumps to make your own electric surfboard.

The M-Jet 60 project originally started as a collaboration with the intention to produce the pump physically. The collaboration ended, and therefore I as the designer, decided to sell the design on its own and enable people to build the pump themselves.

The design is heavily based on my previous M-Jet 30 pump. Main features are 2-stage configuration (2 impellers in a row), integrated motor mount, integrated watercooling, intake grate, thrust bearing, simple impeller mounting system, rear installation. The pump achieves 20kg thrust on 14000 RPM.

Update 24.02.2022: A folder Mods_for_M-Jet_60 with a modified housing with no intake grate was added to the files.

Update 23.05.2022: A single stage mod was added to the Mods_for_M-Jet_60 with modified first impeller and second stage to work in a single stage (single impeller) configuration.

Update 3.6.2023: STEP file of the whole pump was added with the M-Jet_60_STEP_file folder.

M
moretonbaykiting 2024-03-03 20:59:44 UTC
Hi, M-Jet looks great. I'd like to use it as a bow thruster for a large, though very light, vessel. 20kg thrust would be adequate. A commercially available solution (https://www.jetthruster.com/webshop/-c52919289) runs a single jet through a Y valve to allow it to move the bow in either direction. Are you aware of any such implementation with M-Jet? I wonder how much thrust is lost as a result of the jet having to be routed through 90°?
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2024-03-03 21:35:46 UTC
Hello, I haven't designed anything similar to the solution you posted. Because the pipe diameter is still fairly small, I assume there must be quite some pressure loss both in the pipe and in the 90° elbow. Their solution features a centrifugal pump, which generally produces higher pressure difference at a given flow rate. Thanks to the centrifugal pump they are probably able to overcome the pressure loss in the pipes. However, the M-Jet 60 is an axial pump, designed for lower pressure differences. Attaching any pipes to it might result in poor operation.
M
moretonbaykiting 2024-03-03 21:56:49 UTC
Thanks for your prompt reply. I'll investigate further. Two thrusters, facing each direction, with limited pipe work, maybe an option...but one I had hoped to avoid. What immersion depth is required to allow the pump to be primed?
K
krokoman 2023-12-03 12:48:56 UTC
Hi. I am interested in having 2 of this motors installed on a big boat 8000kg of weight. I want it to be able to achieve a speed of 10-15 knots. Do you think i should have the dimensions increased or the mentioned 20kg of thrust would be sufficient? Thanks
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2023-12-03 13:41:27 UTC
Hi, 8000kg of weight is about 80 times heavier than what this pump can push. So unfortunately this is not a good choice for your purpose:)
K
krokoman 2023-12-04 06:45:54 UTC
Hi, thank you for your immediate reply. I will try to find some other solution. Congrats to your great design.
M
martin5 2022-12-09 10:51:00 UTC
which fitting did you use for cooling ? 3/8"
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2022-12-09 14:04:41 UTC
We used a M5 threaded insert with a threaded M5 cooling nipple. A 6mm aluminum pipe can be used instead.
M
martin5 2022-12-10 07:35:25 UTC
the nipple hole is 6.3mm big, how can i use a 6mm plug or M5 insert
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2022-12-10 08:09:30 UTC
I mean the M5 brass threaded insert you use in all parts of the build to attach screws. Then screw a M5 cooling nipple with thread locker into the threaded insert. Also a 6mm aluminum pipe can be glued in using epoxy.
M
martin5 2022-11-22 16:51:17 UTC
Hi, I bought your prototype plan, but I have a few things to ask if I can contact you.
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2022-11-22 19:16:38 UTC
Hi, you can contact me here on CGTrader using personal message or product support. Alternatively you can ask in the official M-Jet facebook group, where more people can share their own experience. https://www.facebook.com/groups/623045356071128
M
martin5 2022-11-23 18:15:31 UTC
I am interested in the infill density of the product at the printer, I have it set to 20%, I am wondering if the propeller should be 100% infill and the housing of the propeller as well, would it be worth it at 20%? and I am also interested in the case, I wanted to print it from PLA STRONGMAN. would it be better to print the propeller from ordinary PLA?
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2022-11-23 18:44:03 UTC
It is a good idea to increase the infill for the impeller. However, 100% infill might cause tolerance issues on the parts because of even a small amount of accidental over-extrusion. Therefore I would recommend using 90% as a maximum, if you really want the parts dense and solid. For all other parts, higher infill is not necessary. The main factor determining strength of the parts is number of perimeters, and the 6 perimeters recommended in manual should be enough. If you are interested, or wish to make a careful decision, this video shows influence of perimeters and infill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmEaNAwFSfI Regarding the PLA STRONGMAN: Although I am open to believe this kind of PLA can have some modified or improved characteristics, I would estimate it will still not excessively differ from regular PLA. For this reason, I think the choice is just up to you, and regular PLA can work as well. A better option would definitely be to print the parts in polycarbonate, or carbon fiber polycarbonate, but this material is difficult to print.
M
martin5 2022-11-24 14:54:21 UTC
the 6 perimeters recommended in manual should be enough. that is if we understand each other correctly WALL LINE COUNT 6
M
martin5 2022-11-24 16:40:04 UTC
thanks for your help and have a nice day.
P
printing-nerd 2022-09-05 12:59:56 UTC
just bought your data. like it a lot. Have check to print The Impeller out of none metallic material? is it working and durable? First price I got for Metal 3d print impeller ist 300€... therefore I might change to PLA/ PC or familiar
M-Jet-Development
M-Jet-Development 2022-09-05 13:11:51 UTC
Hi, the impellers are designed to work just fine when printed in PLA. Polycarbonate would be even better. Just dont use materials which are more flexible like PETG or ABS because then the impellers could bend under load. If you wish to get the impellers 3D printed in metal, I recommend PCBway SLM 3D printing in aluminum, I find the prices very good and definitely lower than what you mentioned. https://www.pcbway.com/rapid-prototyping/manufacture/?type=2&reffercode=TOP
Item rating
9 0
H
humle777 2024-03-10 16:11:02 UTC
Recommended
This was my first purchase of a 3D design product. I must admit I am amazed so far! Status is the files has obviously been downloaded successfully, and 8 out of 10 parts are printed and looks really nice. Parts oriented optimal to achieve the best result (I was told by the friend who printed it for me). Only the impellers came out with a small "beard" since we missed that the designer advised to use supports. Should be an easy fix to clean off. I am eager to put it all together and has now purchased all parts, such as bearings, o-rings, screws, etc. - waiting for it all to arrive an assemble it. The description that came along was just a bonus. It includes important details for the assembly in addition to advise on selection of motor, ESC and battery voltage. So far this was a bargain and I am ready for another purchase if this is the quality to expect. Once all put together I will see if pictures etc. can be shared with you all.
C
cliffe 2024-01-21 16:58:29 UTC
Recommended
So far really pleased, I scaled it up by 25% but not yet finished my project so cant test it.
M
mbemy 2022-11-23 02:24:28 UTC
Recommended
I'd like to rate neutral, was hopeing to see the single stage impeller mod incorporating work done on the M35.
M-Jet 60 - 3D Printable Jet Drive for Electric Surfboards
$10.00
 
Editorial No Ai License 
M-Jet 60 - 3D Printable Jet Drive for Electric Surfboards
$10.00
 
Editorial No Ai License 
Response 93% in 1.6h

3D Model formats

Format limitations
  • Stereolithography (.stl) (3 files)9.74 MB
  • PDF (.pdf)3.58 MB

3D Model details

  • Publish date2022-02-21
  • Model ID#3599074
  • Ready for 3D Printing
Help
Chat