Casual Male Walking Pose Low-poly 3D model

Casual Male Walking

3 LOD OBJ Files

8192*8192px Diffuse Map 4096*4096px Normal Map 4096*4096px Opacity Map

FBX Format

Static mesh.

mmkropp
2016-02-07 02:24
looks so cool!
Reply
mmahmudhassan
Buyer
2016-02-28 04:49
totally useless, I bought it for my game but its not possible to use in the games because you cant make it rigged. It's hand is attached to the jacket. Completely wastage of my money. If you are looking to use in the game never buy it would be wastage of the money!!!
Reply
- Polygonal-Miniatures
  Author
  2016-02-28 08:49
  We talked about it well before purchase. These are meant for arch viz. And are static figures. It's actually the second negative rating a get on this model. Maybe the title (Casual male walking) is misleading? Also,I don't like the way you act, Mamudhassan. Going waaaaaay below the asked price in negotiations, practically begging. And now immediately rating negatively, without talking to me first? Nice. Well, nowhere it says it is riggable, and the images clearly show a NON A-Pose. I will update the title. But next time I hope we'll have a more constructive experience here on CGTrader.
  Reply
  - mmahmudhassan
    Buyer
    2016-02-28 09:18
    mind your tongue mark_florquin for your language: what do you call "Going waaaaaay below the asked price in negotiations, practically begging" it's the system of making offers. If you don like cgtrader offer system why dont you contact them or totally igonore that??? why are you telling me all the rubbish. I have bought the model at your offered price. Actually, you are doing fraud selling static model with "Lowpoly (game-ready)" is definite cheat. It's an open market to make offer if you dont like my price ignore that. You are telling me "beggar" but collecting money by cheating selling static model with low-poly game ready!!! this is not only me you also have another negative record.. Mind it low-poly (game ready) models should not be static. I have the right to react because i am paying for worthless... I did not mention any where that you told me its riggable.. it could be NON A-Pose but the whole model is simply one object. you can change a single shape.. My reaction is something like this because I could not imagine to have such static thing at that price...
    Reply
    - Polygonal-Miniatures
      Author
      2016-02-28 09:56
      Yes, I like the negotiation function on CGtrader. The model was already at a reduced price. Then I don't like people going even lower . Normal as a seller, no? These models ARE game ready. They are lowpoly, and can be put in a game. I provide LOD levels for that purpose. The category description "Game Ready" only applies to polycount. There's also "Animated" and "Rigged" that this prduct is NOT in. I do understand that you have a different angle: In games, characters have to move. Ok, but I offer a different product: Realistic posed characters that can be used in previsualisation of interior scenes. Those are made in Game engines too. And lastly I want to point out that I ask such a price for the photorealistic aspect, time and effort that go into making these. A 3D scan consisting of 144 photo's: It takes investment in time, PC power, camera's and software to get it done. Thanks for you purchase, I hope everything is clear now. Mark
      Reply
- kkneedragr
  2016-03-06 16:25
  The author offers models which are rigged, its clear in the item descriptions which ones are.
  Reply
  - mmahmudhassan
    Buyer
    2016-03-06 17:02
    Did I ever said I do expect as it is rigged?? If you think quote the sentence?
    Reply
    - kkneedragr
      2016-03-06 21:17
      Its pretty clear by your comment that you wanted to end up with a rigged model. Do not try to act smart by playing with words, you only appear more stupid. I've accomplished far more in video games and in life than you ever will an I can say with certainty that you will never amount to much with your attitude. You are doing yourself a disservice with your foolish comments and argumentative behavior.
      Reply
    - kkneedragr
      2016-03-06 21:24
      Let me elaborate on my comment. I did not get to where I am in live by blaming others for my mistakes. Thats what you are doing. I try to learn from my mistakes and try to make the best of them. For instance, If I was you I would not trash the artist due to my mistake. I would contact them, tell them I screwed up and really need a rigged model, and ask if perhaps I could get a discount on a rigged model in exchange for being a good customer in the future. Thats how people who succeed deal with adversity.
      Reply
      - mmahmudhassan
        Buyer
        2016-03-07 03:40
        I don't try to be smart.. God has given me two eyes I have seen before buy that it's not rigged. I have bought the model suppose to be the role playing male character of the tps. I knew that it was not rigged but I did not expected the hands and all the others accessories are not editable. And finally I don't want to learn from you how to be get succeeded. this not the only one marketplace or only the vendor I am dealing with. Look man grass is always greener from other side. Last word: Am I mad why I should expect a rigged model where it has been said it is non rigged. I just want edit the model to tpose then make it rigged by my artist. If you think the artist file is good awesome then buy it, give like it. " I did not get to where I am in live by blaming others for my mistake" you are doing the same you always thought I want the rigged model. I hope it would be clear now..
        Reply
ssprindzhiukas
2016-05-09 15:33
Well that's one of the best scanned\photogrammetry made and most importantly retopologized and remapped ( and that done right might I add) commercial human scans from whose which I was able to lay my hands on. For an architectural viz that type of models are invaluable assets and this particular one, due to its tremendously good quality, can even be put close to the camera. Thanks !
Reply
lludovic-l
2016-05-09 16:04
Very nice
Reply
dom74
2016-05-12 10:15
usefull, thanks.
Reply